Home › Crypto › Gram (anciennement Toncoin)
Is Gram (anciennement Toncoin) (GRAM (ex-TON)) halal?
No condition fails, but 1 point remains to be verified or falls under a tolerated case.
Verdict calculated by Halal Bourse's published rules from an investigation of primary sources (project documentation, registers, decisions), conducted on 10/07/2026 and not reviewed by a human.
The asset
Native currency of The Open Network blockchain (proof of stake), designed in 2018 by the Telegram team; renamed Toncoin, then Gram on June 15, 2026 after a community vote (81.22% in favor); file ton.json Issuer: No issuing entity according to the MiCA white paper: tokens distributed since 2020 by proof of work after Telegram abandoned the project. Since May 2026, Telegram (Telegram FZ-LLC, Dubai) is the main operator and largest validator; The Open Network Foundation (Switzerland) keeps a veto right.
The supply is not capped: 5 billion tokens at launch, issuance to validators of about 4% per year, half of the fees burned. As of October 6, 2026 (23:49 UTC), CoinGecko reports 2.82 billion tokens in circulation (total supply 5.26 billion), a price of €1.35 and a market capitalization of €3.82 billion (rank 32).
Why this verdict
- Permissible purpose : met. The token is used to pay network fees, to take part in validation and voting, and to pay for services (domain names, storage); in Telegram, advertising revenue can be paid out in tokens and Stars can be bought with them. No gambling, interest-bearing loan or illicit-content purpose is found.
- « Gram used to pay fees, participate in validation, voting, and more. » TON (site ton.org) (2026-10-07)
- « Telegram ad revenue can be paid out in Gram » TON (site ton.org) (2026-10-07)
- No riba : met. Simply holding pays no yield: the token confers neither a share of profits nor a right against an issuer. Rewards go only to validators and to those who stake their tokens, a separate product (autres_constats).
- « The GRAM token does not confer ownership, profit participation, governance rights over the issuer » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper Gram, notified to BaFin) (2026-08-03)
- « Staking in TON enables earning rewards by locking Gram to support network security and validation. » TON (documentation, staking) (2026-10-07)
- No gambling : met. A spot purchase is of a blockchain's native currency, recorded on a public ledger and transferable; it is not a contract on a price difference.
- « Gram is the native coin of the TON blockchain » TON (site ton.org) (2026-10-07)
- No excessive gharar : met. The issuance rules are published: no cap, 5 billion at launch, issuance to validators of about 4% per year (noted in the April 9, 2026 update), half of the fees burned. The parties that run the network are identified (Telegram, the Swiss foundation). The distribution is concentrated (four allocations, including frozen 2020 miner addresses and a 25% fund whose depositors are unknown, make up about 58% of the supply): information, not a defect under the Halal Bourse rule on concentration.
- « GRAM does not have a fixed maximum supply. It was launched with an initial supply of 5,000,000,000 units and follows an inflationary issuance model » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper Gram, notified to BaFin) (2026-08-03)
- « it was announced on 2026-05-04 that Telegram would act as the primary operator of the network in place of the Foundation » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper Gram, notified to BaFin) (2026-08-03)
- Real ownership : met. The token is held in non-custodial wallets (self-custody). The withdrawal terms of the purchasing platforms and of the wallet built into Telegram were not studied.
- « is a self-custodial wallet web app that doesn't require installation. » TON (documentation, wallet.ton.org) (2026-10-07)
- No fraud or manipulation : to be verified or tolerated case. On June 26, 2020, the SEC obtained a settlement with Telegram Group Inc. and TON Issuer Inc. over the unregistered offering of the original project's “Grams”: return of more than $1.2 billion and a fine of $18.5 million. The original tokens were never distributed; the current token is that of the network relaunched by the community, which took back the name Gram in 2026, and Telegram has again been the main operator since May 2026. Sanction of the original issuer for unregistered sales: to be verified. AMF blacklist: no results; no deception toward buyers established.
- « The defendants agreed to return more than $1.2 billion to investors and to pay an $18.5 million civil penalty. » SEC (release 2020-146) (2020-06-26)
- « settlement approved on 26 June 2020 required USD 1,224,000,000 to be returned to initial purchasers » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper Gram, notified to BaFin) (2026-08-03)
Opinions found during the research
- Shariyah Review Bureau W.L.L. (Sharia advisory firm, Bahrain, which names a committee of scholars on its site; unsigned page) : “Compliant” (December 2024 assessment): “The Toncoin can be considered Shariah compliant as there are no impermissible use cases.” (2024-12) source
- HalalScreener (automatic rating site, no author named) : “Halal,” 85/100 (grade A): infrastructure token with no prohibited activity; page titled Gram (formerly Toncoin). (2026-10-06) source
- Islamic Finance Guru (editorial list; editorial site, not a scholar) : “Halal? Yes” with the note “Similar analysis to DOT” (undated page, accessed October 7, 2026). (2026-10-07) source
Opinions reported as read, named for what they are; they do not enter into the calculation of the verdict.
What could not be verified
- I-SCAN (IOSCO): not read (access denied, 403 and 429). No contract scan: the token is native (Ethereum and BNB Chain versions exist, not studied).
- Legal link between the issuer sanctioned in 2020 and the current token: the MiCA white paper describes a distinct token, but Telegram became the main operator again in 2026; this is why c6 stays to be verified.
- Identity of the holders of most of the supply mined in 2020 (frozen addresses, TON Believers Fund): not established. Telegram's decisions on the network since May 2026: known only through the white paper and the official site.
- French proceedings against Pavel Durov: outcome not researched.
- Yield of staking products offered by third parties (Wallet in Telegram, liquid pools) and Wallet's withdrawal terms: not studied. Availability on MiCA-licensed platforms: not verified.
- The MiCA white paper is written by a third party (Crypto Risk Metrics), not by an issuer; its concentration figures are cited as not independently verifiable. The ton.org site is undated (accessed October 7, 2026).
- Religious opinions: no opinion from a recognized body (AAOIFI, fiqh academy) on the token found; Sharlife (locked page) and CryptoUmmah (no page) not read; HalalScreener is an automatic rating.
Sources read
- TON (site ton.org)
- TON (documentation, staking)
- TON (documentation, wallet.ton.org)
- Crypto Risk Metrics (livre blanc MiCA Gram)
- CoinGecko (API, euros)
- AMF (liste noire)
- SEC (release 2020-146)
- SEC (interpretation 33-11412)
- Paris Public Prosecutor's Office (press release)
- ESMA (registre MiCA)
- AMF (MiCA)
- Shariyah Review Bureau
- HalalScreener
- Islamic Finance Guru
Other cryptos analyzed
- PayPal USD Questionable
- Sky Prohibited
- USDD Questionable
- UMA Prohibited
- United Stables Questionable
- Venice Token Permitted
- Dogecoin Permitted
- Uniswap Questionable
General information: neither investment advice nor a fatwa. Verdict calculated by published rules, from financial statements read automatically and not reviewed by a human. Read the methodology