Is Arbitrum (ARB) halal?
The six conditions are met for a spot purchase.
Verdict calculated by Halal Bourse's published rules from an investigation of primary sources (project documentation, registers, decisions), conducted on 10/07/2026 and not reviewed by a human.
The asset
Governance token of the ArbitrumDAO, which controls the Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova chains (Ethereum layer 2 networks, optimistic rollups); ERC-20 token issued on Arbitrum One, with a copy on Ethereum Issuer: The Arbitrum Foundation, a Cayman Islands foundation company (registered on November 3, 2022, identified as issuer in the MiCA white paper by Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH); Offchain Labs, Inc. (a Delaware company, original developer; the MiCA white paper names Ed Felten, Steven Goldfeder, Harry Kalodner, Karthik Raju and Gary Wachtel as involved); governance is exercised by the ArbitrumDAO, with token holders voting by delegation.
ARB gives a right to vote in the ArbitrumDAO, which controls the contracts of the Arbitrum One and Nova chains (upgrades, parameters) and spends the treasury funded by transaction fees. It does not pay network fees: these are paid in ether. Initial supply of 10 billion (token generation event on March 16, 2023, airdrop on March 23, 2023): 35.28% to the DAO treasury, 26.94% to the team, contributors and advisors, 17.53% to investors, 11.62% to users, 7.5% to the Foundation, 1.13% to DAOs; the team and investor shares are locked for four years, with monthly releases since March 16, 2024. New minting is possible at up to 2% of the supply per year, by constitutional decision of the DAO: none has occurred (total supply read on-chain on October 7, 2026: about 9.999999 billion). According to CoinMarketCap (October 7, 2026, 11:02 UTC): rank 58, 6.79 billion tokens in circulation. The contract on Arbitrum One is upgradeable through a proxy, but the contract's owner and administrator is the DAO's upgrade executor, not a team.
Why this verdict
- Permissible purpose : met. ARB is the governance token of a DAO that actually exercises control over the Arbitrum One and Nova chains (contract ownership, upgrades, treasury funded by fees): the use is a voting right documented by the Foundation and verified in the contract addresses. ARB does not pay network fees (ether) and gives no right to any income; a 2024 proposal says it is “struggling to accrue value.”
- « The $ARB token is an ERC-20 governance token that allows its holders to participate in the ArbitrumDAO » Arbitrum Foundation (governance documentation) (2026-10-07)
- « Chain ownership of both Arbitrum One and Arbitrum Nova is under the control of the Arbitrum governance system. » Arbitrum Foundation (documentation, state of decentralization) (2026-10-07)
- No riba : met. Holding ARB pays no yield derived from a loan: the chains' fees go to the DAO treasury, not to holders, and the token confers neither a share in profits nor a claim. Staking (delegation against possible rewards) is a product built on the token, covered in autres_constats.
- « fee goes directly to the ArbitrumDAO » Arbitrum Foundation (documentation, fee distribution) (2026-10-07)
- « The ARB token is struggling to accrue value. » Arbitrum governance forum (“ARB Staking” proposal, written by a delegate) (2024-06)
- No gambling : met. A spot purchase is of an ERC-20 token recorded on Arbitrum One (and Ethereum), with a known initial supply, freely transferable; it is not a contract on a price difference. It is not among the sixteen “digital commodities” cited as examples by the SEC and the CFTC on March 17, 2026 (non-exhaustive list).
- « The crypto-assets themselves are not subject to any technical or contractual transfer restrictions and are generally freely transferable. » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (Arbitrum MiCA white paper, notified to BaFin) (2026-05-05)
- « Examples of digital commodities include Aptos (APT); Avalanche (AVAX); » SEC and CFTC (interpretation, release No. 33-11412) (2026-03-17)
- No excessive gharar : met. The token, its distribution (team and investor shares locked for four years) and the issuance rule (minting of at most 2% per year, reserved to the contract owner, which is the DAO's upgrade executor, once a year) are published and verifiable in the published code. The parties that control the token are identified: the DAO by vote, the Security Council of 12 members elected each year (9-of-12 threshold), the Foundation (directors named in the MiCA register), Offchain Labs. Non-blocking reservations: the chains' sequencer is run by the Foundation, and the Security Council can act without a DAO vote in an emergency.
- « New $ARB can be minted at a rate of 2% of its supply per year at most » Arbitrum Foundation (ARB token documentation) (2026-10-07)
- « The team, contributor, and investor tokens unlock over a 4 year period, starting from 16 March 2023. » Arbitrum Foundation (documentation, offre en circulation) (2026-10-07)
- Real ownership : met. ARB is an ERC-20 token held in a personal wallet and transferred without technical restriction. Point to flag: in April 2026, the Security Council of the Arbitrum One chain froze, through an emergency upgrade, 30,766 ETH held by the perpetrator of a hack (KelpDAO): the power to act on balances exists at the chain level; it is not in the token contract and was not exercised on ARB (see autres_constats). The choice of purchase platform was not studied.
- « The crypto-assets themselves are not subject to any technical or contractual transfer restrictions and are generally freely transferable. » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (Arbitrum MiCA white paper, notified to BaFin) (2026-05-05)
- « the Security Council executed an emergency action to freeze 30,765.667501709008927568 ETH held by the KelpDAO Exploiter on Arbitrum One » Arbitrum governance forum (Security Council, emergency action of April 21, 2026) (2026-04-21)
- No fraud or manipulation : met. No sanction, fine or deception toward ARB buyers was found. The AMF blacklist returns no result for “arbitrum.” The team is public, the token code is published and the governance contracts were audited by Trail of Bits (report of January 6, 2023, then successive audits through 2026). Concentration: 15.3% for the top ten wallets excluding exchanges and contracts on Arbitrum One (information only under A.8).
- « No result » AMF (liste noire, recherche « arbitrum ») (2026-10-07)
- « Trail of Bits 01/06/2023 Governance & Token Bridge » Arbitrum (documentation, list of security audits) (2026-10-07)
Contract security scan
GoPlus security scan of the ARB contract on Arbitrum One (the main contract): 2,390,355 holders; top ten wallets excluding exchanges and contracts 15.3%; code published; token on GoPlus's trust list; no honeypot, tax or freeze signal; only signal: contract upgradeable through a proxy (is_proxy). Reading under A.8: the proxy's administrator is the chain's ProxyAdmin, whose owner is the DAO's upgrade executor (0xCF57…A827, direct chain reading on October 7, 2026, address confirmed by the Foundation's deployments page); the same executor owns the token contract. The minting function in the published code is reserved to the owner, capped at 2% per year and once a year, and has never been used (total supply below 10 billion, chain reading). These are governance powers of an identified issuer, exercised by DAO vote: no rug pull signal within the meaning of A.8. Copy on Ethereum (0xB507…4ad1, bridged token): 66,794 holders; supply of 239.6 million units (about 2.4% of the 10 billion); top ten wallets excluding exchanges and contracts 59.4%; proxy administered by the DAO's Ethereum upgrade executor (0x3fff…Cedd, deployments page): the concentration there concerns a marginal copy, information only, not retained as a signal.
Opinions found during the research
- HalalScreener (automatic rating site, no author named) : “Halal,” 85/100 (grade A): token with no prohibited activity, governance utility; reviewed on October 7, 2026 (2026-10-07) source
- ShariaQuant (screening site; “AI-assisted” verdict, no scholar named) : “Halal”: neutral, general-purpose layer 2, governance token with no income for holders; the site flags as a risk for the holder that the Security Council can freeze funds (2026-09-30) source
- CryptoUmmah (site of Thanvir, former director at S&P Global Energy; review attributed to Imam Omar Siddiqi) : Compliance score 75.3 out of 100, “Halal · Recommended with Purification”; asks to examine the DeFi protocols built on the network (2026-07-11) source
- Sharlife (Malaysian Shariah screening site, not a scholar) : Status “Shariah”; review from the first quarter of 2023, before the token launched; full paywalled report not read (2023-Q1 (page read on 2026-10-07)) source
- Islamic Finance Guru (editorial staff list; editorial site, not a scholar) : “Halal?” column: Yes for Arbitrum (ARB), with no analysis published; page undated (2026-10-07) source
Opinions reported as read, named for what they are; they do not enter into the calculation of the verdict.
What could not be verified
- I-SCAN (IOSCO): read by a client without a browser; for “arbitrum foundation” and “offchain labs” the page contains no table and no quotable “no result” message (absence not quotable). Halal Bourse's check script receives a 403 error on this page: the I-SCAN quotations cannot be re-read by script.
- Chain readings (owner and administrator of the contracts, total supply) done through public RPC calls on October 7, 2026, with no quotable page; only the addresses published by the Foundation and the verified code from Sourcify are cited.
- Identity of the holders of the top ten wallets of the copy on Ethereum (59.4% of 239.6 million units): not labeled, not researched.
- Current composition of the Security Council and of the Foundation's board of directors: not read beyond the mention of the mechanisms; the MiCA register names Campbell Law, Edward Noyons and Ani Banerjee as directors or contacts in the Cayman Islands, without their exact role read.
- Current (2026) state of ARB staking and rewards: not verified. Share of the chains' fees coming from derivatives or gaming applications: not published.
- Audit specific to the ARB token contract: Trail of Bits's “Governance & Token Bridge” audit (January 6, 2023) is cited in the official list; the report was not read (PDF not found at the search address). The MiCA white paper states that no full audit can be confirmed.
- No legal proceeding or regulator decision targeting the Foundation, Offchain Labs or the token was found by web search: absence of results, not proof of absence. SEC position on ARB: none found.
- Religious opinions: no opinion from a recognized body (AAOIFI, fiqh academy) on this token found; the five opinions are screening sites, including two automated ones; Shariyah Review Bureau: no page for ARB.
Sources read
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation: the ARB token
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation: state of progressive decentralization
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation: fee distribution
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation: deployed addresses
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation : offre en circulation
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation: airdrop and distribution
- Arbitrum Foundation, documentation: the Foundation
- Arbitrum, documentation: security audits
- Arbitrum forum: Security Council emergency action (April 21, 2026)
- Forum Arbitrum : proposition ARB Staking
- Cointelegraph: Arbitrum freezes $71 million of ether tied to the Kelp attack
- Crypto Risk Metrics (livre blanc MiCA Arbitrum, 5 mai 2026, version XHTML)
- Sourcify (verified code of the ARB token implementation on Arbitrum One)
- GoPlus Security (ARB contract on Arbitrum One)
- GoPlus Security (ARB contract on Ethereum)
- SEC and CFTC, joint interpretation (March 17, 2026)
- ESMA, MiCA interim register
- AMF, listes noires, recherche « arbitrum »
- OICV, I-SCAN, recherche « arbitrum »
- HalalScreener, Arbitrum
- ShariaQuant, Arbitrum
- CryptoUmmah, Arbitrum
- Sharlife, Arbitrum
- Islamic Finance Guru, liste crypto
Other cryptos analyzed
- Derive Prohibited
- Jupiter Prohibited
- NEAR Protocol Permitted
- Hedera Permitted
- BNB Questionable
- Cardano (ada) Permitted
- Cronos Questionable
- Bitget Token Questionable
General information: neither investment advice nor a fatwa. Verdict calculated by published rules, from financial statements read automatically and not reviewed by a human. Read the methodology