Is Pepe (PEPE) halal?
3 conditions out of six fail.
Verdict calculated by Halal Bourse's published rules from an investigation of primary sources (project documentation, registers, decisions), conducted on 10/07/2026 and not reviewed by a human.
The asset
ERC-20 token on Ethereum (memecoin) launched on April 14, 2023, inspired by the “Pepe the Frog” meme Issuer: No issuing entity: the project's website states “no formal team”; a project multisig (Safe, 3 signatures out of 4) holds about 0.5% of the supply.
Supply fixed at 420,690,000,000,000 PEPE, with no further creation possible; 6.9 trillion were burned on October 23, 2023 (the contract still shows the initial supply). As of October 6, 2026 (23:49 UTC), CoinGecko shows a price of €0.0000038 and a market capitalization of €1.60 billion (rank 60).
Why this verdict
- Permissible purpose : not met. The project's website calls the token “completely useless”, with no formal team or roadmap, and the MiCA white paper filed by a third party (Crypto Risk Metrics, July 2, 2026) concludes that PEPE has no function of its own beyond transfer and confers no rights. No permissible use is documented: the only payment acceptance found is that of a sweepstakes social casino (June 2025); payment providers list the token with no identified merchant (autres_constats). Halal Bourse rule A.8 (October 6, 2026): token with no function, c1 and c3 not met.
- « the coin is completely useless and for entertainment purposes only. » Pepe (site officiel pepe.vip) (2026-10-07)
- « It has no functionality of its own beyond transferability on the Ethereum network and confers no rights on its holders. » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper for Pepe, notified to BaFin) (2026-07-02)
- No riba : met. Holding PEPE pays no return: the token confers no profit share or right, and the project presents itself with no “expectation of financial return”.
- « The PEPE token does not confer ownership, profit participation, governance rights over any issuer » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper for Pepe, notified to BaFin) (2026-07-02)
- « $PEPE is a meme coin with no intrinsic value or expectation of financial return. » Pepe (site officiel pepe.vip) (2026-10-07)
- No gambling : not met. A token with no function: its value depends only on supply and demand on secondary markets, so the gain can come only from resale to another buyer (Halal Bourse rule A.8 of October 6, 2026: c1 and c3 not met).
- « $PEPE is a meme coin with no intrinsic value or expectation of financial return. » Pepe (site officiel pepe.vip) (2026-10-07)
- « its value, if any, is determined exclusively by market dynamics such as supply, demand, and liquidity » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper for Pepe, notified to BaFin) (2026-07-02)
- No excessive gharar : not met. Issuance is frozen: no minting, contract ownership renounced (owner() = null address), supply published. But the project has no identified entity and a multisig (Safe, 3 signatures out of 4) holds 2,124,739,408,495 PEPE, about 0.5% of the supply (on-chain read of October 7, 2026, identical to the white paper of June 30). In August 2023, 16 trillion PEPE were sold from the “CEX” multisig, by three former members according to the last founder, described as anonymous, who took control of it back. Rule A.8: an anonymous party controls a treasury. Borderline case: the current signers are not named, and the white paper cites people “linked” to the project without attributing this control to them.
- « Following the incident, the remaining team member assumed control of the CEX wallet. » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper for Pepe, notified to BaFin) (2026-07-02)
- « that wallet held approximately 2,124,739,408,495 PEPE, approximately 0.5% of the total supply » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper for Pepe, notified to BaFin) (2026-07-02)
- Real ownership : met. PEPE is an ERC-20 token held in a personal Ethereum wallet (MetaMask). The withdrawal conditions of purchase platforms were not studied.
- « The crypto-asset may be used for peer-to-peer transfers on the Ethereum network and may be held in compatible Ethereum wallets. » Crypto Risk Metrics GmbH (MiCA white paper for Pepe, notified to BaFin) (2026-07-02)
- No fraud or manipulation : to be verified or tolerated case. No sanction or regulator action found; AMF blacklist: no result. One risk signal is established: unidentified team (“no formal team”). Other facts: sale of 16 trillion PEPE (about $15 million) in August 2023 from the project's multisig, according to the project itself, with no court ruling found; official website compromised by Inferno Drainer code on December 4, 2025. The contract's blacklist and pause functions are reserved to the owner, which is the null address: they can no longer be exercised (scan_securite). Liquidity burned; top ten wallets excluding exchanges 37.3% (upper bound), under 50%; an audit is neither found nor ruled out. A single established signal: to be verified.
- « No results » AMF (liste noire, recherche « pepe ») (2026-10-07)
- « three ex-team members [who] came back behind my back. » Decrypt (2023-08-26)
Contract security scan
GoPlus security scan of the PEPE contract on Ethereum: 596,996 holders; top ten wallets excluding exchanges and contracts 37.3%; code published. Signals found: Transfers can be suspended by the contract (transfer_pausable). The contract can freeze addresses (blacklist, is_blacklisted). Reading under rule A.8: both signals come from a single function of the code: the blacklist and the transfer rule apply only through the contract owner (onlyOwner). The owner is the null address (GoPlus and an owner() call on a public node): no one can use them anymore. They do not constitute an insider power to freeze. Liquidity burned (“LP tokens are burnt”), no minting, no tax. The 37.3% figure is an upper bound (not all exchanges are labeled).
Opinions found during the research
- CryptoUmmah (screening site; page written by Thanvir, reviewed by Imam Omar Siddiqi) : “Haram · Not Permissible”, compliance score 43.7/100; report noting the lack of utility (speculation/utility ratio 5/100). (2026-07-13) source
- HalalScreener (automatic rating site, no author named; “AAOIFI has no crypto standard” according to the page) : « Doubtful », 50/100 : « PEPE is a meme token with no stated utility, roadmap, or revenue mechanism. » (2026-10-06) source
- Islamic Finance Guru (editorial staff list; editorial site, not a scholar) : “Halal? Yes”, with no comment (undated page, consulted on October 7, 2026). (2026-10-07) source
Opinions reported as read, named for what they are; they do not enter into the calculation of the verdict.
What could not be verified
- I-SCAN (IOSCO): not read (access denied, 403 and 429). The site pepe.vip does not open with the local DNS; it was read by forcing the address found by a public resolver; it is undated (© 2025).
- Signers of the multisig (Safe 3 out of 4, 0x3100…cBdD): addresses read on-chain, identities not found. The white paper cites people “linked” without attributing control to them: this is the limit of c4.
- Audit: no contract audit found, but the absence cannot be proven (the white paper only says that no full audit can be confirmed). If established, it would make two signals with the anonymous team (rule A.8: c6 not met).
- Use: volumes and merchants not published; role of PEPE as loan collateral (2024 Aave proposal, outcome not read) not established. The Block article (403) not read; Decrypt read instead.
- Top ten wallets: nature not cross-checked (Blockscout and GoPlus do not label them); the scan figure is an upper bound. Availability on MiCA-licensed platforms: not verified.
- Sharlife: PEPE page locked (subscription), not read. Sources more than eighteen months old: Decrypt (2023).
- Religious opinions: no opinion from a recognized body on PEPE found; CryptoUmmah and HalalScreener are rating sites, not fatwas.
Sources read
- Pepe (site officiel)
- Crypto Risk Metrics (livre blanc MiCA)
- GoPlus Security
- Blockscout (contrat PEPE)
- CoinGecko (API, euros)
- AMF (liste noire)
- Decrypt
- Cointelegraph
- Seeking Alpha
- NOWPayments
- SEC (Statement on Meme Coins)
- ESMA (registre MiCA)
- AMF (MiCA)
- CryptoUmmah
- HalalScreener
- Islamic Finance Guru
Other cryptos analyzed
- Sui Permitted
- Aave Prohibited
- Cardano (ada) Permitted
- Ether Permitted
- KuCoin Token Questionable
- Pepe Prohibited
- StandX DUSD Prohibited
- Canton Coin Permitted
General information: neither investment advice nor a fatwa. Verdict calculated by published rules, from financial statements read automatically and not reviewed by a human. Read the methodology