Is USDS (USDS) halal?
No condition fails, but 3 points remain to be verified or fall under a tolerated case.
Verdict calculated by Halal Bourse's published rules from an investigation of primary sources (project documentation, registers, decisions), conducted on 10/07/2026 and not reviewed by a human.
The asset
decentralized stablecoin (collateral-backed) Issuer: Sky protocol (formerly MakerDAO), with no single issuer; governed by holders of the SKY governance token.
Stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, an upgraded version of Dai (Ethereum contract 0xdC035D45d973E3EC169d2276DDab16f1e407384F, upgradeable proxy), created when borrowers or protocol agents draw USDS against collateral. About 6.84 billion USDS on Ethereum on October 7, 2026 according to Etherscan, 7.03 billion in total according to DefiLlama; price of 0.9999 USD.
Why this verdict
- Permissible purpose : to be verified or tolerated case. USDS is used to hold and transfer dollars and in many DeFi uses; no gambling or impermissible-content purpose is found. But each USDS originates from a loan (collateral deposited by borrowers or capital entrusted to agents who deploy it as credit), which ties the token's purpose to what it represents (see c2).
- « USDS provides a scalable credit facility for independent capital allocators. » Sky Ecosystem Insights (protocol documentation) (2026-10-07)
- « Crypto Vaults ETH, WBTC, and stETH posted by borrowers. Each vault is independently overcollateralized with automated liquidation. » Sky Ecosystem Insights (protocol documentation) (2026-10-07)
- No riba : to be verified or tolerated case. The simple USDS holder receives no yield from the token itself, but the protocol collects stability fees from borrowers and revenue from credit and real-world assets, and pays part of it to holders who go through sUSDS (rate set by governance) or deposit their USDS for agent rewards; these products are outside the spot purchase but show the origin of the yield.
- « Sky Protocol generates stability fees from borrowers and distributes yield to sUSDS holders. » Sky Ecosystem Insights (protocol documentation) (2026-10-07)
- « Yield is funded by protocol revenue, including fees from collateralized loans and returns from deployed capital across the Sky Agent Network. » Sky Ecosystem Insights (protocol documentation) (2026-10-07)
- No gambling : met. The spot purchase is of a transferable ERC-20 token (17,314 holding addresses on Ethereum on October 7, 2026), priced at 0.9999 USD and convertible 1 for 1 into USDC through the stability module; it is not a bet on a price difference without purchase or delivery.
- « USDS Holders 17,314 » Etherscan (jeton USDS) (2026-10-07)
- « "usd":0.999885 » CoinGecko (API) (2026-10-07)
- No excessive gharar : to be verified or tolerated case. The issuance rules and the code are published, and the protocol reports collateral exceeding liabilities; but the detailed composition of the collateral (structured credit, real-world assets, agent loans, USDC in the stability module) could not be read, as the dashboard is loaded by script. S&P Global Ratings rates the stability of USDS and Dai 4 (“constrained”).
- « Sky Protocol's collateral portfolio is designed to always exceed outstanding obligations » Sky Ecosystem Insights (protocol documentation) (2026-10-07)
- « backed by a diversified mix of collateral types including including structured credit, fixed income, energy financing, AI infrastructure, onchain and fintech lending, and RWAs » Sky Ecosystem Insights (protocol documentation) (2026-10-07)
- Real ownership : met. USDS is held in a personal wallet; the implementation code read on Etherscan contains no address-freeze function, but the contract is upgradeable by governance (UUPS proxy) and a freeze function was mentioned by the founders in 2024, not activated at launch; minting is reserved to the protocol's authorized addresses.
- « It is designed with upgradeability in mind, using the UUPS pattern and ERC-1967 proxy storage standards. » Sky Protocol Docs (jeton USDS) (2026-10-07)
- « function mint(address to, uint256 value) external auth » Etherscan (USDS contract code, implementation) (2026-10-07)
- No fraud or manipulation : met. No sanction, regulator warning or deception of buyers was found for USDS or MakerDAO; the protocol's credit rating, the governance structure and the 2024 debate on a freeze function are reported in autres_constats without amounting to fraud.
- « No result » AMF (listes noires, recherche « usds ») (2026-10-07)
- « There are no warnings that match your search criteria. » OICV (I-SCAN, recherche « usds ») (2026-10-07)
Contract security scan
GoPlus security scan of the USDS contract on Ethereum: 17,471 holders; top ten wallets excluding exchanges and contracts 0.7%; code published. Signals noted: Contract upgradeable via proxy: the code can change after the fact (is_proxy). Reading (rule A.8): no single issuer, the Sky protocol is governed by holders of the SKY token; the minting right reserved to the protocol's authorized addresses (mint function with “auth” control) is the very mechanism of the stablecoin and not a rug pull signal; the contract is upgradeable via proxy (UUPS) by governance; GoPlus does not fill in the minting and blocking fields (“?”) and the code read on Etherscan contains no address-freeze function; the share of the top ten wallets excluding exchanges (0.7%) is low.
Opinions found during the research
- ShariaQuant (screening site; “AI-assisted” verdict, no scholar named) : Verdict “Haram”: the protocol's model and revenue rest on interest-bearing loans (stability fees) and on interest-generating real-world assets, with more than 33% of revenue coming from sources judged non-compliant; sUSDS is classified “Haram”. (2026-07-23) source
- CryptoUmmah (British charity; page stating a review by Imam Omar Siddiqi) : Classification “haram”, compliance score of 41.5 out of 100 (riba 18.6; gharar 54.9; maysir 56.7). (2026-07-16) source
- Islamic Finance Guru, article signed by Mohammed Ayaaz Adam on Dai, the protocol's twin token (the article cites no fatwa) : Dai can in itself be judged permissible, but the interest earned on Dai (Dai Savings Rate) is judged “categorically impermissible”. (2025-09-01) source
- Darul Ifta, Jamia Darul Uloom Karachi: Mufti Muhammad Taqi Usmani and five other signatories (fatwa of June 10, 2026 reported by the daily Dawn; original text not read; does not mention USDS) : Purchase of goods with a cryptocurrency declared not permitted, cryptocurrency not being a māl (property) according to the research cited, “whether in the form of USDT or other crypto tokens”. (2026-07-10) source
Opinions reported as read, named for what they are; they do not enter into the calculation of the verdict.
What could not be verified
- Figures on the composition of the collateral (agents Spark, Grove, Obex, USDC in the stability module, real-world assets): financial.skyeco.com dashboard loaded by script, not read; the figures differ between protocol pages (collateral $15.96 then $17.23 billion; supply 11.99 then 10.14 billion).
- Freeze function: absent from the code read on Etherscan (implementation 0x1923…); contrary claims by a third-party site not verified; implementations on other chains not read.
- Contract audits, risks of agents and real-world assets, concentration of SKY votes, identity of the team: not read or determined.
- I-SCAN: “sky” returns 129 lines, not examined; S&P rating taken from Disruption Banking, S&P page not read. Sharlife: no USDS page. MiCA status: absence from the ESMA CSVs, with no sentence to quote; no AMF position found.
- c6 classified as “met” for lack of a sanction, deception or scan signal within the meaning of rule A.8; the Dai profile (October 5) holds “to be verified” on related facts (S&P rating, voter coalition).
Sources read
- Sky Ecosystem Insights — protocol documentation
- Sky Protocol Docs and Sky.money
- Disruption Banking — S&P Global Ratings stability ratings
- Etherscan — USDS token and contract code
- ESMA — registre MiCA
- ShariaQuant and CryptoUmmah — USDS
Other cryptos analyzed
- Polygon (jeton POL, ex-MATIC) Permitted
- Avalanche Permitted
- Lighter Prohibited
- Arbitrum Permitted
- Ondo Questionable
- USDS Questionable
- PayPal USD Questionable
- Hyperliquid Prohibited
General information: neither investment advice nor a fatwa. Verdict calculated by published rules, from financial statements read automatically and not reviewed by a human. Read the methodology