Is Pi Network (PI) halal?
No condition fails, but 2 points remain to be verified or fall under a tolerated case.
Verdict calculated by Halal Bourse's published rules from an investigation of primary sources (project documentation, registers, decisions), conducted on 10/07/2026 and not reviewed by a human.
The asset
Native currency of the Pi network (layer 1 with FBA consensus derived from the Stellar protocol, mined by phone; mainnet “open” since February 20, 2025) Issuer: No single issuer: the MiCA white paper states that the network is operated by SocialChain, Inc. (Delaware, Palo Alto), which developed the app, launched the token model and oversees protocol development; Pi Community Company (Cayman Islands) holds part of the intellectual property; the Pi Foundation (a Cayman Islands foundation company, created in December 2024) owns PiBit Ltd (British Virgin Islands), which is seeking admission to trading in the European Union. The founders are Nicolas Kokkalis and Chengdiao Fan (named in a 2026 US court order)..
PI pays a fee of 0.01 PI per transaction on its chain and is presented as a payment currency for marketplaces in the Pi ecosystem. PI is mined by users in the app (“Pioneers”) at a rate that depends on their activity, their referrals (“referral team”) and their voluntary lock-ups; the maximum supply is 100 billion PI, of which 80% to the community and 20% to the founding team according to the white paper. A PI mined in the app can be transferred on the mainnet only after identity verification (KYC) and migration. According to CoinMarketCap, 11.24 billion PI were in circulation on October 7, 2026 (rank 67).
Why this verdict
- Permissible purpose : met. PI has a documented function: a fee of 0.01 PI per transaction on the Pi chain and a planned means of payment in the ecosystem's marketplaces. The scale of actual use has not been measured by any independent source read (see lacunes).
- « A gas fee of 0.01 Pi applies to each on-chain transaction. » PiBit Ltd (MiCA white paper for PI, October 2025) (2025-11-27)
- « Pi is the native, fungible digital asset of the Pi Network Layer 1 blockchain. » PiBit Ltd (MiCA white paper for PI, October 2025) (2025-11-27)
- No riba : met. Holding PI pays nothing in itself: the MiCA white paper states that no right or obligation is attached to the token (no income, no distribution). No loan is involved in the spot purchase. The voluntary lock-ups (“lockups”) that raise the Pioneers' mining rate are covered in autres_constats.
- « There are no rights or obligations associated with the Pi token. » PiBit Ltd (MiCA white paper for PI, October 2025) (2025-11-27)
- No gambling : met. A spot purchase of PI on the secondary market delivers a token transferable through the buyer's platform; it is not a contract on a price difference.
- « The manner of transferring purchased Pi to holders depends on the exchange from which such tokens are purchased in the secondary market. » PiBit Ltd (MiCA white paper for PI, October 2025) (2025-11-27)
- No excessive gharar : to be verified or tolerated case. The allocation rules are published (100 billion at most; 80% community, 20% founding team; no presale) and the MiCA white paper declares up to 10 billion reserved for the Pi Foundation and 5 billion for a liquidity pool. However, the team's share unlocks at the pace of community mining and “may be subject to additional lock-up through a mandate the team imposes on itself”: neither the schedule nor the control of the corresponding wallets can be verified in the sources read; SocialChain oversees protocol development; the Pi Foundation's executives are not named (only PiBit's sole director is); the MiCA white paper states that no audit has been carried out. The founders are identified; no anonymous party is established, but control of the supply and the treasury remains to be verified.
- « the Pi community has 80% and the Pi Core Team has 20% of the total circulating supply of Pi » Pi Network (official website, white paper, economics chapter) (2026-10-07)
- « may be subject to additional lockup through a self-imposed mandate » Pi Network (official website, white paper, economics chapter) (2026-10-07)
- Real ownership : to be verified or tolerated case. The mainnet has been open since February 20, 2025 (admission on platforms) and the only documented wallet is the Pi Wallet, non-custodial, in the Pi browser: the user holds a secret phrase generated on their phone. But the balance mined in the app becomes transferable on the mainnet only after KYC and migration, and in September 2026 hundreds of thousands of users remained blocked (insufficient transfer fees, verification cases). The MiCA white paper also requires business verification (KYB) for businesses that want to hold non-custodial addresses. For a buyer on a platform, no primary source read confirms that they can withdraw their PI to a personal wallet (an external wallet is presented as planned, not as available, in the official FAQ); secondary sources indicate that deposits and withdrawals go through the Pi Wallet.
- « Pi Network does not maintain custody of holders' Pi token. » PiBit Ltd (MiCA white paper for PI, October 2025) (2025-11-27)
- « The mobile balance becomes transferable to your Mainnet Wallet after you pass KYC » Pi Network (site officiel, FAQ) (2026-10-07)
- No fraud or manipulation : met. No sanction or ruling establishing deception of PI buyers was found; the AMF blacklist returns nothing for “pi network” and the I-SCAN matches are homonyms with no established link. A US class action (Moen v. SocialChain, federal court for the Northern District of California) accuses the founders of false statements about decentralization and undisclosed sales; on January 15, 2026, the court dismissed the securities law claims without leave to amend and the other claims with leave to amend, without ruling on the merits of the fraud. Unadjudicated accusation: information under the Halal Bourse rule, but several allegations converge (see autres_constats) and are left to Halal Bourse's judgment. The GoPlus scan does not apply to a native currency.
- « Inc., Nicolas Kokkalis, Chengdiao Fan, Pi Community Company, and Does 1-50 » Federal court for the Northern District of California (order of January 15, 2026, case 25-cv-09145-NC) (2026-01-15)
- « No results » AMF (liste noire, recherche « pi network ») (2026-10-07)
Contract security scan
Not applicable: PI is the native currency of its own chain; the starting file lists no contract on another chain. No GoPlus scan was therefore carried out (rule A.8: the scan does not apply to native currencies). The MiCA white paper declares the token contract immutable and without administrative power, a statement not verified.
Opinions found during the research
- Halal Screener (automated screening site, not a scholar) : “Halal”, score 85/100 (grade A): qualitative screening based on the protocol's use and mechanics, with no review of governance or ownership; no AAOIFI standard for crypto (2026-10-07) source
Opinions reported as read, named for what they are; they do not enter into the calculation of the verdict.
What could not be verified
- Withdrawal to a personal wallet: no primary source read says whether a buyer on a platform can withdraw their PI to a wallet they control, or what conditions (KYC, list of KYB-verified platforms) apply; the existence of third-party wallets compatible with the Pi chain has not been established.
- Open mainnet: the list of validators, the share of nodes operated by SocialChain or the foundation and the publication of the protocol code were not found; one of the claims in the Moen complaint (three centralized validator nodes) is an unverified allegation.
- Control of the supply: addresses of the foundation, team and liquidity pool wallets, actual unlocking schedule of the team's share (“self-imposed mandate”) and signers: not found; the 96.37% concentration comes from a media outlet, with no data source produced; the “82.8 billion” share that this outlet attributes to the team was not accepted.
- Executives of the Pi Foundation (Cayman Islands) and of Pi Community Company: not named in the sources read; PiBit is run by a single director.
- Actual use: no independent source read measures the number of payments or active apps in PI; the MiCA white paper describes the use as planned.
- Moen litigation: state of the case after January 15, 2026 (amended complaint, dismissal, appeal No. 26-3802 indicated on June 12, 2026) not confirmed by a page read (the Justia tracking page cannot be read by a bot).
- Regulator warnings: Chinese police (2023) and other authorities are cited by media; no regulator warning was read at the source. Blacklists: AMF and I-SCAN consulted only for the names “pi network”, “pi coin”, “socialchain”.
- Religious opinions: only Halal Screener (automated) covers PI; another version of this page, cited by a search engine, indicated “Doubtful” (50/100): the version read on October 7, 2026 indicates “Halal” (85/100). The Sharlife page for PI is subscriber-only; no CryptoUmmah page or Islamic Finance Guru row for PI.
- PiBit's MiCA white paper: read mostly through text extraction; pages of the project white paper and of the 2021 to 2022 official FAQ partly out of date (“closed network period” rules), cited for the allocation and referral rules; their date is not shown on the page (reading date).
Sources read
- PiBit Ltd, MiCA white paper for PI (October 2025)
- Pi Network, white paper (economics chapter)
- Pi Network, FAQ officielle
- Pi Network, blog: KYC and migration updates (September 17, 2026)
- Federal court for the Northern District of California, order of January 15, 2026 (Moen v. SocialChain)
- Crypto Times, Is Pi Network a scam? (13 mars 2026)
- CryptoPotato, pyramid scheme accusations against PI
- ESMA, MiCA interim register
- AMF, listes noires, recherche « pi network »
- OICV, I-SCAN, recherche « pi network »
- Halal Screener, Pi Network (PI)
Other cryptos analyzed
- Render Permitted
- USDS Questionable
- Pump.fun Questionable
- Ethereum Classic Permitted
- Quant Questionable
- Kaspa Permitted
- UMA Prohibited
- Compound Prohibited
General information: neither investment advice nor a fatwa. Verdict calculated by published rules, from financial statements read automatically and not reviewed by a human. Read the methodology